Archive for February, 2006


Just Don’t Call it "Princeton"

Posted on February 6th, 2006 in Uncategorized | No Comments »

BlogPicture
(Source: Princeton University)What do the Princeton Ski Shops, the Princeton Driving School, the Princeton Review and Princeton Portfolio Research and Management have in common? They have nothing to do with Princeton University.

And that's what irks folks at the real Princeton. It seems some businesses, including Merrill Lynch, which wants to rename its money management operation (see portfolio research above), are eager to draw prestige and luster from the Ivy brand. Many of these companies claim they're simply borrowing the name of the town-Princeton, NJ. Sure…we believe that. Just like you'd take the name "New Haven" if you were based there.

Anyway, go here to read more about this fuss.

Stanford Embarrassed Over Grammar Boo-Boo

Posted on February 1st, 2006 in Uncategorized | No Comments »

BlogPicture

Can you find the errors in this sentence?

the Stanford's purchased `the farm' from the Gordon's in 1876.Too bad people at Stanford University apparently couldn't!

The line appeared on a prominent plaque at the university, prompting visitors to speculate that it was a student prank. It wasn't.

In the most embarrassing kind of irony, one of the nation's best universities has proudly displayed poor grammar.

What do you think? Should this be chalked up to 'one of those things,' or should Standford officials feel embarrassed?

From the Mercury News:Too many apostrophes, not enough proofreaders. That was the opinion of legions of angry Mercury News readers who wrote to demand a correction of Stanford University's bronze plaque outside the Gordon Carriage House, which was featured in an article and photograph published Wednesday.

The plaque explains that “the Stanford's purchased `the farm' from the Gordon's in 1876.''

While historically accurate, the sentence outraged Bay Area punctuation police, who seek to remind Stanford that apostrophes are meant for indicating possession, not pluralization.

“It's hard to believe that not a single person associated with writing the text or ordering, making, or installing the plaque noticed,'' wrote Stephanie Cerra. “I'd expect better from a project associated with Stanford.''

“Quick, somebody, replace the plaque before it becomes the university condoned precedent for all those illiterate merchant vendors' `Tomato's,' `Pea's,' `bean's,' `Shoe's,' etc. signs that sprout on roadsides and in our markets,'' wrote Edward Strong. “Where was the Mercury editor to let this appear without comment?''

“The mistake is an embarrassment to the community as well as to the university,'' according to Marcine Landon. Charle Tilford proposed that “Someone from their English Department should get out there with a grinder!''