Archive for April, 2007


Sponsored Post: TechSmith Brings Free Virtual Sticky Notes and Skype Accessories to SnagIt

Posted on April 30th, 2007 in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Sponsored Post: TechSmith Brings Free Virtual Sticky Notes and Skype Accessories to SnagIt

TechSmith Corp., the world's leading provider of screen capture and recording solutions, today announced the release of its SnagIt Notes and Skype Output accessories. SnagIt enables computer users to take screenshots of exactly what they see on their screens to communicate ideas faster, explain concepts clearly, and archive electronic information with point-and-click convenience.

With SnagIt Notes, customers can take screenshots, add graphic elements and text, and save them to their desktop as a virtual sticky note. With SnagIt's Skype Output, customers can share screen captures over chat sessions with a single click, adding visual reference or clarification to any conversation.

"In today's multi-tasking, information-intensive world, these two accessories will help any knowledge worker get more organized and save precious minutes throughout the day," said Tony Dunckel, SnagIt product manager at TechSmith. "We hope our customers find the Notes and Skype accessories to be a nice complement to the powerhouse feature set SnagIt is known for. These are the second group of free and fun accessories that we'll be rolling out this year."

Using SnagIt Notes, customers can:

Create visual reminders by saving screen captures as a virtual sticky note on their desktop and add text at any time.
Save screenshots to the clipboard or to the SnagIt editor to do more with the image later.
Avoid desktop clutter by organizing multiple notes from the tray icon, including opening, closing, hiding, and rolling up notes.
Using the SnagIt Skype Output customers can:

Quickly communicate ideas effectively with screenshots instead of wasting time typing and speaking lengthy explanations.
end unlimited screen captures to the same person over chat without having to save and attach them all to an email.
SnagIt is the world's most popular screen capture software with more than 7 million users worldwide. With SnagIt, users can capture, edit and share any image, including scrolling windows, objects, menus, video, text, and Web pages and include them in emails and instant messages, PowerPoint presentations, MS Office documents, marketing and sales materials, technical documentation, class handouts, websites and blogs.

System Requirements and Availability
SnagIt 8.2 supports Microsoft, Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows Vista. SnagIt 8.2 can be downloaded immediately at www.techsmith.com. SnagIt Notes and Skype Output can be downloaded at http://www.techsmith.com/snagit/accessories.asp. The suggested retail price is $39.95 for a single-user license. Free trial licenses are also available. For additional information, visit: http://www.techsmith.com/snagit.asp.

Sponsored by TechSmith

Best Graduate Schools for 2008

Posted on April 30th, 2007 in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Best Graduate Schools for 2008

Pundits may dismiss the U.S. News rankings as superficial, misleading, misguided, or simply a profit-making scheme. Whatever you call them, add "influential" to the list. Right or wrong, people pay attention to them, as do institutions.

So here we go for 2008, graduate style. The "best" are (envelope, please)…

Business
1) Harvard
2) Stanford
3) Penn (Wharton)
4) MIT (Sloan)
5) (Tie) Northwestern (Kellogg), U. Chicago

Law
1) Yale
2) Harvard
3) Stanford
4) NYU
5) Columbia

Medicine (Research)
1) Harvard
2) Johns Hopkins
3) Penn
4) Washington U.
5) UC-San Francisco

Engineering
1) MIT
2) Stanford
3) UC-Berkeley
4) Georgia Tech
5) Illinois

Education
1) Columbia (Teachers College)
2) Stanford
3) (Tie) Harvard, Vanderbilt
5) UCLA

Community Colleges in the Spotlight

Posted on April 26th, 2007 in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Community Colleges in the Spotlight
(Source: The New York Times)

The New York Times is offering a few articles on community colleges, along with profiles of students and individual institutions. For those considering a two-year school, the section's worth a look.

Here's a bit from John Merrow's intro:

Matters were simpler 100 years ago, when junior colleges were created to prepare deserving students for the final two years of a university. In fact, the very first public junior college, in Joliet, Ill., was set up in a high school, as the equivalent of grades 13 and 14.

Community colleges today do far more than offer a ladder to the final years. They train the people who repair your furnace, install your plumbing, take your pulse. They prepare retiring baby boomers for second or third careers, and provide opportunities for a growing number of college-age students turning away from the high cost and competition at universities. And charged with doing the heavy remedial lifting, community colleges are now as much 10th and 11th grade as 13th and 14th.

It's a long to-do list on a tightening public purse. Two-year colleges receive less than 30 percent of state and local financing for higher education, according to the American Association of Community Colleges. Yet they are growing much faster than four-year colleges and universities, enrolling nearly half of all undergraduates. That's 6.6 million students. Add those taking just a course or two, and the total reaches some 12 million.

You can read the rest here and find the "Ed Life" section here.

Homegoing

Posted on April 23rd, 2007 in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Homegoing
(Source: Princeton University)

Homecoming. It's a time-honored tradition on American campuses. Football games. Parties on the quad. Parades featuring returning alums. Revelry and reflection.

Hogwash. We've decided to dump it at my institution. Why? See my latest Chronicle of Higher Education column:

It's officially spring, though the New England weather gods evidently haven't consulted the calendar lately. Campuses across America are busy planning commencement exercises and dipping into their coffers to woo only the most deserving speakers. Many of us working in development and alumni relations are also busy planning next year's homecoming events.

Yes, it's not even beach season, and we're already contemplating the fall. Nothing wrong with thinking ahead, especially where huge budgets are concerned. Homecoming is a prodigious undertaking, involving meticulous coordination, judicious stewardship of funds, and a creative spirit to keep hordes occupied and entertained. The result can be thousands of happy graduates who speak fondly of you and write generous checks.

Why, then, have we decided to scrap it altogether?

Because that time-honored tradition, that staple of collegiate life for generations, that annual pilgrimage to rekindle warm fuzzies, is a flop. I've attended two homecomings on this campus, and the collective attendance could fit in my bathroom. It's not that our alumni hate the college; it's simply a matter of tradition. Or lack thereof.

You see, my institution spent its youth as a commuter college. We've become more residential over the years, but still only half of our undergraduates live on the campus. Many work part time or full time while taking classes, and vacate the premises on Friday afternoon. The sense of place just isn't very strong for many students, and it doesn't get any stronger when they become alumni.

Read the rest here.

Reflecting on Virginia Tech

Posted on April 19th, 2007 in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Reflecting on Virginia Tech
(Source: Associated Press)

The killing rampage at Virginia Tech remains the top story in the media, dominating the evening news, radio call-in shows, and talk TV on Fox. Related issues such as gun control, psychological profiling, foreign students and crisis communications are on everyone's mind.

For in-depth coverage of the situation, visit the Chronicle of Higher Education, which features various articles and commentaries, along with multimedia presentations. Most of the material is accessible (some is restricted to subscribers). Be sure to read the profiles of the victims. And for historical perspective, see the list of other "major shootings" on American campuses.

Once again, condolences and best wishes to the families affected by this tragedy.

Tragedy Strikes Virginia Tech

Posted on April 17th, 2007 in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Tragedy Strikes Virginia Tech
(Source: Associated Press)

Yesterday a student at Virginia Tech waged a shooting spree on campus, killing 32 people. The gunman was also killed. The incident is being called one of the deadliest mass murders in U.S. history.

Today's Chronicle of Higher Education offers the following:

As darkness fell over the Virginia Tech campus here on Monday night, hundreds of students clutched one another in tears at the Holtzman Alumni Center to wait for news about friends they feared had died in one of the deadliest shooting rampages in American history.

Hours earlier a gunman had opened fire in a classroom building, killing 30 people and injuring at least 30 others before turning the gun on himself. Before that, the police say, he killed two people in a dormitory.

The rampage stunned those on this close-knit but sprawling 2,600-acre campus that is nestled in the Blue Ridge mountains.

And even as Virginia Tech reeled from the massacre, many people questioned the university's response. They wanted to know why it took more than two hours to notify the 26,000-student campus of the first shootings, and why more buildings were not locked down sooner.

Find the rest here.

Virginia Tech no doubt has some PR damage control to deal with. Meanwhile, condolences to all the families affected by this senseless tragedy.

Presidents Boycotting U.S. News?

Posted on April 12th, 2007 in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Presidents Boycotting U.S. News?

It's that time of year again, when college presidents are asked to opine on the educational quality of other colleges and universities–all for the greater glory of U.S. News and its annual rankings issue. As we've seen, college presidents have vented their displeasure with this "beauty contest" for years, but now they're attempting to corral the troops and boycott the practice altogether. Without data–particularly the "reputational survey" that constitutes 25 percent of the scores–the magazine would be crippled.

Read this from the Christian Science Monitor:

A revolt is brewing among college presidents against the influential college rankings put out each year by U.S. News & World Report.

Dozens of schools have recently refused to fill out surveys used to calculate ranks, and efforts are now afoot for a collective boycott.

Colleges have complained in the past about the rankings. But recent events have rallied opposition, including the tying of presidential pay to ranking at Arizona State University and accusations by the president of Sarah Lawrence College that the magazine threatened to use hocus-pocus data to stand in for average SAT scores at the school.

At the heart of the matter: A college degree is increasingly expensive, and students and parents want to make informed decisions. But educators worry that the rankings have made college a commodity, creating a false impression that schools can be easily compared and stressing out students who want only the "best" schools.

"This increasing interest in measuring everything – these so-called science-based measures of [educational] outcomes and the like – seems to me to be so misguided that it's now captured the imagination of the leadership in higher education," says Christopher Nelson, president of St. John's College in Annapolis, Md., who heads an association of 124 prestigious liberal arts schools. "This is a bad way of talking about an education. [Students] aren't consumers shopping for a product."

Well, yes, actually, they are. Let's continue:

The boycott of the U.S. News rankings could be extended in coming weeks as a draft letter makes the rounds of academia. The letter, formulated by a dozen college presidents and an education activist, calls for others to join them in neither filling out the magazine's survey form nor touting rankings in marketing materials.

The "reputational survey," as it's called, asks college administrators to rank the quality of hundreds of schools on a one to five scale. The data – which critics call a "beauty contest" – account for 25 percent of the overall U.S. News rankings.

You can find the rest here.

So should college presidents just shut up and fill out the forms, or do they have a point? Are educational rankings really that bad? Are they misleading? Or are presidents simply afraid of what rankings reveal?

As always, stay tuned.

Faust a Second (Third, Fourth…) Choice for Harvard?

Posted on April 9th, 2007 in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Faust a Second (Third, Fourth...) Choice for Harvard?
(Source: Harvard University)

Was Drew Faust Harvard's first choice for president? Evidently not, though this revelation is hardly surprising. Harvard always culls presidents from its alumni; Faust is the first non-alum since the original president (who of course couldn't have been an alum). So it's safe to say Faust was down the list. But how far?

For an inside look at the selection process, see Richard Bradley's piece in the new issue of 02138 magazine. As you can surmise from the title (Cambridge's zip code), the publication focuses on everything Harvard. Here's a bit:

On the morning of Wednesday, January 31, Thomas R. Cech, the Nobel Prize-winning head of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, picked up the phone and called the Harvard Crimson. In December, the newspaper had reported that Cech was a candidate for the presidency of Harvard. Now, Cech told the paper, "I have withdrawn my name from consideration."

Quickly posted online, those words shocked the Harvard campus. Cech wasn't the first candidate to say no, but his exit was different. It came late in the search process, and the campus buzz had it that he wasn't just a candidate, he was a leading candidate. With Cech gone, who was left?

Eleven days later, at a news conference filled with flashbulbs and fanfare, the Harvard Corporation, the more powerful of the university's two governing boards, announced that historian Drew Gilpin Faust would be Harvard's 28th president. Only a handful of the people present knew that behind its wall of unanimity, the Corporation was keeping a secret: Faust was not its first choice. Had he wanted the job enough, Thomas Cech would have been the star of that press conference. Instead, his exit sparked a hasty sequence of events that led to Faust's coronation as Harvard's first female president, hailed as a symbol of progress for women everywhere and widely seen as a rebuke to prior president Lawrence H. Summers.

Faust's ascension marked the beginning of a new chapter in Harvard history, but the story was almost very different.

Read the rest here.

Selective Colleges Even More Selective

Posted on April 4th, 2007 in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Selective Colleges Even More Selective
(Source: Columbia University)

Getting into the nation's best colleges has become even more difficult, if you can imagine that. Everyone is so brand conscious these days, and spots at the top educational brands are at a premium.

Want some numbers? Check out this New York Times article:

Harvard turned down 1,100 student applicants with perfect 800 scores on the SAT math exam. Yale rejected several applicants with perfect 2400 scores on the three-part SAT, and Princeton turned away thousands of high school applicants with 4.0 grade point averages. Needless to say, high school valedictorians were a dime a dozen.

It was the most selective spring in modern memory at America's elite schools, according to college admissions officers. More applications poured into top schools this admissions cycle than in any previous year on record. Schools have been sending decision letters to student applicants in recent days, and rejection letters have overwhelmingly outnumbered the acceptances.

Stanford received a record 23,956 undergraduate applications for the fall term, accepting 2,456 students, meaning the school took 10.3 percent of applicants.

Harvard College received applications from 22,955 students, another record, and accepted 2,058 of them, for an acceptance rate of 9 percent. The university called that "the lowest admit rate in Harvard's history."

Applications to Columbia numbered 18,081, and the college accepted 1,618 of them, for what was certainly one of the lowest acceptance rates this spring at an American university: 8.9 percent.

"There's a sense of collective shock among parents at seeing extraordinarily talented kids getting rejected," said Susan Gzesh, whose son Max Rothstein is a senior with an exemplary record at the Laboratory School, a private school associated with the University of Chicago. Max applied to 12 top schools and was accepted outright only by Wesleyan, New York University and the University of Michigan.

"Some of his classmates, with better test scores than his, were rejected at every Ivy League school," Ms. Gzesh said.

The brutally low acceptance rates this year were a result of an avalanche of applications to top schools, which college admissions officials attributed to three factors. First, a demographic bulge is working through the nation's population – the children of the baby boomers are graduating from high school in record numbers. The federal Department of Education projects that 3.2 million students will graduate from high school this spring, compared with 3.1 million last year and 2.4 million in 1993. (The statistics project that the number of high school graduates will peak in 2008.) Another factor is that more high school students are enrolling in college immediately after high school. In the 1970s, less than half of all high school graduates went directly to college, compared with more than 60 percent today, said David Hawkins, a director at the National Association of college admission counseling.

The third trend driving the frantic competition is that the average college applicant applies to many more colleges than in past decades. In the 1960s, fewer than 2 percent of college freshmen had applied to six or more colleges, whereas in 2006 more than 2 percent reported having applied to 11 or more, according to The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 2006, an annual report on a continuing long-term study published by the University of California, Los Angeles.

Read the rest here.

U. of Florida Wins Tourney, Loses Early Decision

Posted on April 3rd, 2007 in Uncategorized | No Comments »

U. of Florida Wins Tourney, Loses Early Decision
(Source: University of Florida)

Congratulations to Florida for winning back-to-back national titles in college basketball. Sandwiched between those victories was the Gators' BCS championship in college football. What a year for Gainesville.

Lost in the news was the university's decision to eliminate its early decision program. It seems Florida wants to expand its applicant pool. I doubt they'll have trouble attracting applicants, especially sports fans.

Here's how InsideHigherEd.com covered it:

The chain seemed to break in September. That's when the University of Virginia said it planned to end its binding early decision program – an announcement that followed just weeks after similar pledges at Harvard and Princeton Universities. The move was followed by months of quiet, until now.

In a decision that officials say has nothing to do with other institutions' actions and everything to do with its expanding applicant pool, Florida is eliminating its binding early admissions program. Instead of giving students an option of October 1, November 1 and January 16 application dates (with the first being binding), the university is moving to one mid-November deadline.

In doing away with their early admission programs last fall, colleges cited criticism that the system favors wealthier applicants who are looking for an edge and are not concerned about comparing financial aid packages. At Florida, early decision applicants are generally wealthier and less likely to be first-generation students than those who apply regular decision, according to university officials.

"Since financial aid decisions aren't made until spring, it seemed unfair to ask students to sign a contract without being able to compare contracts at multiple campuses," said Janie M. Fouke, Florida's provost and senior vice president for academic affairs.

Added Zina L. Evans, assistant provost and director of admissions: "This alleviates students' anxiety of having to choose when to apply and eliminates the perception that applying at one deadline gives anyone an advantage."

The move comes at a time when Florida is seeing a surge in student interest. Since 2000, the number of applications has increased by 18 percent. During that time, the university's acceptance rate has decreased from 62 to 48 percent and the yield – percentage of accepted applicants who enroll – has increased from 55 to 64 percent. Test scores and grade point averages have also risen slightly in the past several years, Evans said.

Read the rest here.